Uncorked Ventures Blog
Every once in a while we find a wine which just seems almost too good to be true.
We found one of those wines for our Special Selections customers in February.
Quivet Cellars is a project from winemaker Mike Smith who got his start under one of the best tutors in all of Napa Valley, Thomas Browne who is responsible for the award winning wines at Schrader Cellars. Mike’s journey has been well chronicled in and of itself, but suffice to say we have a ton of respect for anyone willing to get started in the wine industry by driving to Napa every weekend from your family home in Oregon and working for free.
We always like to include an impartial review, so here is what famed wine critic Robert Parker had to say:
“Myriad and Quivet from Mike Smith. I cannot say enough good things about the Myriad and Quivet wines from Mike Smith. I have mentioned this before, if you are not on their mailing list, sign-up today. These wine rock and the pricing is extremely reasonable.”
- Robert Parker online 2/14/2008
We couldn’t agree more.
The wine we selected for our Special Selection Wine Club members is the Kenefick Ranch Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon. We thought this would be a good fit of four choices from Quivet for a couple of reasons. To start, the Kenefick Ranch is on the Napa Valley floor in really, really good real estate. The Eisele Vineyard of Araujo is just a few yards away which shows how good this fruit really is. We know our club members open their wines shortly after receiving them, so we chose a wine from the Valley floor instead of mountain fruit which can be more condensed and tannic and might necessitate cellaring for some time.
Lastly, Quivet gives a good example of how we find wine. We originally started talking to Chris Maybach the Proprietor of Maybach Family Vineyards. Of course an allocation of Maybach is incredibly difficult to assertain as they have a waiting list for their own wine club which is approaching a decade, but during our conversations Chris mentioned that one of Thomas Browne’s crew had his own label. Mike Smith was that crew member and Quivet was that label. For that, thank you Chris we appreciate being pointed in the right direction.
One of the least understood facts in the wine trade is that Robert Parker doesn’t review every wine listed in Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate. For years the publication has been the foremost authority on fine wine throughout the world and Parker’s affinity for both Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon and all things Bordeaux have helped those two regions gain even further market share during the last two decades.
It was with great sadness that we saw Parker’s decision to retire from reviewing current California vintages on Feb 1st, 2011. He’ll continue on with Bordreaux and with older California vintages, but this is really the end of an area.
For a man responsible for so much growth and change within the wine industry, we’re always been impressed with Parker’s ability to keep a level head about wine and wine critics. The long term implications for California wines are certainly unknown, but it’ll likely be years before the influence of Wine Advocate begins to wane, if it ever does.
Personally, we’re glad to see some added attention being paid to wine years after it was left in a cellar. There is perhaps nothing more frustrating than savoring a bottle for a generation, only to open it and be under whelmed by the entire experience. Here is hoping Parker can revolutionize cellared wine in the same way he did new releases with his once ground breaking 100 point scale.
“Dear eRobertParker.com Subscriber:
I am thrilled to announce that Antonio Galloni will have expanded responsibilities for The Wine Advocate and http://www.eRobertParker.com as of February 1, 2011. I would like to take credit for my powers of persuasion over recent years in trying to convince Antonio of the virtues of covering additional wine regions, but if truth be known, the writing was always on the wall that his enviable talents and passion for this field would ultimately prevail, and the beneficiaries are the world’s wine consumers.
Antonio will continue to focus on the wines of Italy as well as Champagne, but two new areas of responsibility for Antonio will include the red and white Burgundies of the Côte d’Or as well as the crisp white wines of Chablis, and the wines of California. These vast regions will benefit from the increased depth of coverage, as will all the major wine regions of the world.
Additionally, sectors that merit dramatically more attention but have not had sufficient coverage, including Beaujolais and the Mâconnais (now economically as important as the Cote d’Or and Chablis) will be put under a microscope by David Schildknecht, who will continue with his other areas of responsibility but will be freed from covering the Cote d’Or and Chablis.
I will turn to something I have long played around with in The Wine Advocate but have rarely had enough time to do. Older readers may remember the vintage retrospectives called “What About Now?” With Antonio turning his attention to California, I am going to begin a series of horizontal and vertical tastings of perfectly stored California wines that will give readers insight into how they are developing. It has been a long-term ambition of mine to include more reports on older vintages, and this change will allow me to do this not only in California, but also to increase the older vintage reports for Bordeaux and the Rhône Valley.
In all other respects, the staff assignments at The Wine Advocate remain identical. I hope all of you share our great enthusiasm for the fact that Antonio Galloni has finally taken the plunge and will be devoting most of his time to his wine writing career, a job for which he seems particularly well-suited and sure to excel.
All the best in wine and life,
Robert M. Parker, Jr.
P.S. The Wine Advocate writer assignments are:
Robert Parker – Bordeaux, the Rhône Valley, older vintages of Bordeaux, Rhône and California wines
Antonio Galloni – Italy, Champagne, Chablis, Côte d’Or, California
David Schildknecht – Germany, Loire, Beaujolais and Mâconnais, Eastern U.S., Austria,
Eastern Europe, Languedoc-Roussillon, Jura
Jay Miller – Oregon, Washington, South America, Spain
Lisa Perrotti – Brown – Australia, New Zealand
Neal Martin – Critic-at-Large overlapping all areas, plus specific reviewer of South Africa
Mark Squires – Bulletin Board supervision and occasional articles on Israel, Portugal, and Greece
One thing we’ve realized at Uncorked Ventures is that many of our customers (and hopefully our readers here) are interested in finding new and exciting ways to learn about wine. Like us, they don’t want the usual conversation and stale tasting notes. To that end, we’ll be sharing blogs which we not only enjoy, but those which provide valuable information.
Our first featured blog is: 1 Wine Dude
Who writes it? Joe Roberts who believes in talking about wine in a real way for consumers without the time to memorize which vineyard in Oakville had unusually sunny days during the 2004 growing season. On a daily basis, 1 Wine Dude is a wine consultant and part of the band Sephage.
Why we read it? Frankly, Joe has an interesting and slightly off beat take on the world of wine. We respect his liberal comment policy, his weekly Twitter recaps (personally, I love those) and have enjoyed his stories of late about going pro and attempting to earn a living in the wine industry. As a start up ourselves, we remember those first days and believe he’ll be successful over the long term.
Bottom line it for us? If you want to find a wine blog written by a trained professional, without the up-tight attitude that many serious wine blogs tend to have while keeping an eye on wine news worldwide, 1 Wine Dude is a great, interesting and informative read.
Keep up the good work Joe and congratulations on getting a job for the man.
Every so often we have a customer, or frankly a family member who asks the most basic question of them all: How do you guys find wine?
It’s a basic question, but also goes directly to the root of our business, why should a consumer spend their hard earned money with us rather than another online wine club with a bigger brand name or with a local wine retailer who won’t be charging them shipping every month?
Let’s start by talking a bit about the types of wines that we’ve found and we’ll follow up with some specific examples in an entry later on in the week with examples of how we found specific wines.
We are always trying to find high quality, small production wines before they receive their scores from Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate or other industry publications. If we wait until after they’re scored, there is a real chance that there won’t be any wine to buy because quantities are so limited.
A great example comes from our Wine Exploration Wine Club. We recently shipped a Chardonnay from Mt Eden Vineyards, specifically their 2008 Wolffe Vineyard. 2008 wasn’t suppose to be a great year for wine, especially in the Edna Valley, but when we tasted the wine we thought it fell in closer with the wineries much pricier estate Chardonany’s than we were expecting. At a retail price of $20 it really was a perfect fit for our Wine Exploration Wine Club customers who are generally looking for quality wines which can be opened as soon as they arrive.
We weren’t surprised when we saw the following come across from Food and Wine Magazine and their annual list of the best wines $20 and under:
2008 Mount Eden Vineyards Wolff Vineyard ($20)
In 2008, bad weather in California’s Edna Valley drastically cut the amount of fruit from Wolff Vineyard but packed flavor into the grapes. Jeffrey Patterson makes this wine exactly the same way he makes Mount Eden’s pricier estate Chardonnays, producing a white with vivid flavors of pear, peach and lime.
We have had similar experiences with a few bottles and wineries, one of which was included in our February Special Selections Wine Club shipment this week. Come back for more examples of wines which we’ve shipped, before they were scored or approved by major critics.
When is a 10 letter word really a 4 letter word within the wine industry? How can a tiny aphid only 1/13th of an inch long and 1/16th of an inch wide capable of inflicting billions of dollars in damage?
Phylloxera is a tiny aphid which feeds on the roots of vines. The aphid has destroyed vineyards from North America, Europe, South America and all the way to Australia and everywhere in between.
As it turns out, Phylloxera is a native of North America. Most native vines to this continent come with some level of protection against the pest, but unfortunately these grapes are more suited to making grape jam than they are wine. Concord is a great example of a native grape to North America.
As it turns out French scientists in the 1860’s wanted to study American vines and sent for a series of samples to test. Unfortunately, Phylloxera hitched a ride with the vines and the results were largely catastrophic. By 1873 the entire French wine industry was in a state of upheaval with wine quality suffering and vines literally dying by the millions. The French government went so far as to offer a reward for anyone who could come up with a solution to the problem. Chemicals were tested without success. Likelywiese vineyards were flooded with water and even white wine…the pest kept coming.
Meanwhile the fledging California wine industry was planting European vines in their fields in an attempt to improve quality levels and gain a place in the international wine market.
At the beginning of the 20th century, the pest infected California vines and the same results quickly came to fruition. Finally a solution was discovered.
Plant American rootstock, but graft on European vines so you receive vines which are resistant to Phylloxera without sacrificing quality.
Things went quite smoothly and aside from a small outbreak here and there Phylloxera wasn’t heard from again until the 1980’s when the pest started to once again destroy California vineyards. As it turns out many California vintners had planted a version of the rootstock which was in effect half American and half European, making it susceptible to Plylloxera after only a few genetic mutations. California biologists knew the risks but proceeded anyway, while their European counterparts having been hit much harder by earlier outbreaks decided to plant only truly native American rootstocks.
So what was the cost to the California wine industry due to the 1980’s explosion of Phylloxera? At least 1.2 Billion Dollars was spent to re-plant vines and wait at least three years before being able to use the grapes commercially.
There is a positive to the story though. Biology and viticulture had come leaps and bounds ahead by the time the Plylloxera hit vineyards in the 1980’s when compared with earlier invasions. This new and advanced research has allowed vineyard owners to replant vineyards with clones and grape varieties more suited to their specific growing conditions.
As we’ve found in the wine industry, not every negative is truly a negative. The Phylloexera epidemic in the 1980’s led to a tremendous amount of suffering for California vintners, but the industry wouldn’t have the same quality level today if the pest had never come back to its ancestral home.
September 12, 2014
August 29, 2014
August 28, 2014
August 27, 2014
August 27, 2014
August 22, 2014
August 21, 2014
August 20, 2014
August 19, 2014
August 13, 2014
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (11)
- July 2014 (11)
- June 2014 (9)
- May 2014 (3)
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (4)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (7)
- September 2013 (9)
- August 2013 (7)
- July 2013 (14)
- June 2013 (9)
- May 2013 (4)
- April 2013 (2)
- March 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (6)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (2)
- August 2012 (15)
- July 2012 (7)
- June 2012 (2)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (4)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (5)
- January 2012 (10)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (13)
- September 2011 (12)
- August 2011 (8)
- July 2011 (14)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (26)